News and Resources

U.S. Supreme Court to Hear Case Over Whether Texas Congressional and House Maps Discriminate

By Alexa Urn January 12, 2018 – THE TEXAS TRIBUNE

The U.S. Supreme Court - Washington, D.C.

The U.S. Supreme Court – Washington, D.C.

Further extending a drawn-out legal battle, the U.S. Supreme Court on Friday agreed to hear a case over whether Texas’ congressional and House district boundaries discriminate against voters of color.

The high court’s decision to take the case is a short-term win for Texas’ Republican leaders who, in an effort to preserve the maps in question, had appealed two lower court rulings that invalidated parts of the state’s maps. If the high court had declined to take the case, Texas would have been forced to redraw the maps to address several voting rights violations.

The Supreme Court’s decision to weigh the state’s appeal will further delay any redrawing efforts even after almost seven years of litigation between state attorneys and voting and minority rights groups that challenged the maps. It’s unclear when the court will schedule oral arguments in the case, which is formally known as Abbott v. Perez.

In ruling against the maps last year, a three-judge panel in San Antonio sided with the voting and minority rights groups who accused Republican lawmakers of discriminating against voters of color, who tend to vote for Democrats, in drawing the maps. The state has denied targeting voters by race and admitted instead to practicing partisan gerrymandering by overtly favoring Republicans in drawing the districts.

The panel specifically flagged two congressional districts and nine House districts in four counties as problematic. But the Supreme Court in September temporarily blocked the lower court rulings — and any efforts to redraw the maps — in two 5-4 decisions as it considered the appeal from Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton.

The San Antonio panel had ruled in August that Hispanic voters in Congressional District 27, represented by U.S. Rep. Blake Farenthold, R-Corpus Christi, were “intentionally deprived of their opportunity to elect a candidate of their choice.” And Congressional District 35 — a Central Texas district represented by Democrat Lloyd Doggett of Austin — was deemed “an impermissible racial gerrymander” because lawmakers illegally used race as the predominant factor in drawing it.

On the House side, the panel ruled that Texas needed to address violations in Dallas, Nueces, Bell and Tarrant counties where it said lawmakers diluted the strength of voters of color. In some cases, the judges found that lawmakers intentionally undercut minority voting power “to ensure Anglo control” of legislative districts.

Citing the need to provide election administrators with clarity on district boundaries, the state had argued in legal briefs that the Supreme Court risked throwing “the Texas election deadlines into chaos” if it allowed the redrawing of the state’s maps to move forward prior to the March primary vote.

The minority rights groups suing the state had formally asked the high court to dismiss the state’s appeal. They argued that “the right to legal districts prevails” when choosing between delaying electoral deadlines and addressing “voters’ ongoing harm” under the current maps.

The state’s currents maps, which have been in place for the past three election cycles, were adopted by the Legislature in 2013. They’re largely based on temporary maps drawn by the three-judge panel in San Antonio amid legal wrangling over the maps lawmakers drew in 2011.

The 2011 maps, which the San Antonio judges also ruled were drawn to weaken the strength of Hispanic and black voters, never took effect. But the panel ruled that the intentional discrimination behind the 2011 maps carried over into the 2013 maps in places where district boundaries were unchanged.

“After six years in litigation, we welcome swift action from the highest court in the land,” said state Rep. Rafael Anchia, a Democrat and chairman of the Mexican American Legislative Caucus, which is a plaintiff in the case. “We are hopeful that the court will provide justice to voters and agree that discrimination will not be tolerated in our elections.”

In a Friday statement, Paxton applauded the Supreme Court’s decision and reiterated his outrage over the San Antonio panel’s decision to block the 2013 maps that had been drawn the lower court.

“The lower court’s decisions to invalidate parts of the maps it drew and adopted are inexplicable and indefensible,” Paxton said.

The high court did not act on the Texas Democratic Party’s request to revive a legal claim over partisan gerrymandering — a redistricting strategy that until recently was deemed acceptable. The high court last year heard arguments in a Wisconsin case over the limits of partisan gerrymandering and whether extreme practices can be deemed unconstitutional. A ruling in that case is pending. The court has also agreed to consider a partisan gerrymandering case out of Maryland.

Hanging over the Texas case is the possibility that the state will be placed back under federal oversight of its elections laws.

A barrage of court rulings last year — including the two redistricting rulings handed down last August — have forced Texas leaders to confront whether they strayed too far in enacting voting laws found to have disproportionately burdened people of color.

For decades under the Voting Rights Act, Texas was a on a list of states needing the federal government’s approval of election laws, a safeguard for minority voting rights called preclearance. The Supreme Court wiped clean that list in 2013, but it left open the possibility that future, intentional discrimination could lead to a return to preclearance.

Read related Tribune coverage:

  • In separate orders issued Tuesday, the U.S. Supreme Court blocked two lower court rulings that invalidated parts of the state’s congressional and House maps where lawmakers were found to have discriminated against voters of color, putting on hold efforts to redraw those maps. [Full story]
  • As part of a weeklong trial, the state’s legal foes are turning their attention to lawmakers’ actions in 2013 in an effort to finally resolve years-long litigation over Texas’ political maps. [Full story]
  • A barrage of court rulings has forced Texas leaders to confront whether they strayed too far in enacting voting laws found to have disproportionately burdened minorities. [Full story]

School Vouchers a Key Motivator for Opposition to GOP Incumbents Who Did Not Sign Speaker Commitment Forms

Scott Braddock – January 3, 2018

Supporters of failed anti-teachers’ union legislation vow to spend big to remake GOP caucus; backlash from educators could moderate Senate leadership’s tone in the primary.

There was so much jubilation from some in 2017 over the demise of the “bathroom bill” that one could be forgiven for forgetting Texas adopted an Arizona-style immigration crackdown and Gov. Greg Abbott signed a sweeping anti-abortion law of more significance than the one filibustered by then-Sen. Wendy Davis in 2013. Both face ongoing court challenges but you get the idea: Victories for liberals or even “moderates” in Texas were as few and far between as ever last year.

Speaker Joe Straus has been widely lauded for the fact that his team, primarily retiring House State Affairs Committee Chairman Byron Cook, killed gender-based restroom restrictions. But that is now in the past and, as some veteran lobbyists have said, will only be a footnote in Texas political history by this time next year.

As for the immediate future, the way in which a supermajority in the House was galvanized against Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick is instructive when it comes to how some key battles may play out in primaries, the general, and the 2019 session.

Instead of choosing to solely be a roadblock for Gov. Abbott’s special session agenda, Straus organized the members around support for public education. The numbers were on Straus’ side and Patrick knew it, as evidenced by the Lite Guv’s attempt to assert his credibility on public education heading into the special session and, more recently, in challenging Straus to make House appointments to the newly-created School Finance Commission.

The House’s failed plan to add $1.8 billion into the school finance system received 132 “yes” votes when it first passed in the lower chamber in ‘17. Vouchers were soundly rejected with overwhelming bipartisan opposition 103 to 44 even as Patrick and Abbott rallied for “school choice” on the south steps of the Texas Capitol.

Rural Republicans were unimpressed as Patrick exclaimed “Give us a vote, House!”

“You won’t like the vote,” replied Rep. Chris Paddie, R-Marshall, on social media.

Since then, Lt. Gov. Patrick has again been speaking with authority on education as if he were still the Senate Education Committee Chairman. One key advantage Patrick always had in legislative battles with Straus is his experience as a chairman.

Straus, first elected to the preside over the House when he was a sophomore, never held the gavel in a committee room. That’s why Straus so often had to lean heavily on his chairmen for tactical help rather than give them orders, which isn’t his style anyway. Even solid committee work on major legislation did not always translate into a firm plan on the House floor. That’s a big part of the reason for the meltdown during the debate of Senate Bill 4.

But Straus’ focus on public education in the special session provided many GOP House members with something to legitimately support when they otherwise would have been quite squeamish at the prospect of being perceived as nothing more than speed bumps for Abbott and Patrick’s agenda.

Now that Straus is on his way out and the campaign season is on its way in, Patrick is questioning the Speaker’s credibility on public education and a top Senate lieutenant is challenging whether education groups can organize ahead of the GOP primary.

“If the speaker is truly serious about working on this issue, he will announce his appointments soon,” Patrick said in the hours before Straus made his picks for the School Finance Commission. “This will be the first school reform commission since the Perot Commission in 1984,” Patrick said. Patrick’s office also suggested he would pressure Gov. Abbott to convene the commission without House appointees if it came to that.

Meantime Sen. Paul Bettencourt, R-Houston, is asking the Office of the Attorney General to weigh in with an opinion on whether it is an improper use of public funds for school districts to provide transportation to polling places for employees and students.

Sen. Bettencourt also said he was “alarmed” that at least 100 school boards have adopted this resolution encouraging administrators to create “a culture of voting” and “to encourage maximum participation by District employees and eligible students in the elections process.”

No one here at Buzz Central is naïve enough to think support for public education in GOP primaries is going to trump “issues” like “keeping men out of women’s rooms” or how the next speaker is chosen. But it is worth remembering “school choice” is the prime motivator of the Texas Public Policy Foundation board members who spent heavily against the Straus team in 2016. Support for school vouchers was the reason TPPF was founded by Jim Leininger years ago.

Some of that group has now been reconstituted as the New Leadership PAC.

After Straus and Cook announced their retirements, the PAC promised to supply $100,000 a piece to challengers who would take on “core Straus acolytes.” The PAC hasn’t responded to requests for comment about which candidates will be beneficiaries of their largesse.

That PAC’s leadership, including businessman Don Dyer of Austin, have been among the biggest supporters of anti-union legislation targeting teachers’ groups while exempting police and fire unions.

Straus’ team killed that bill for two sessions in a row as Dyer’s business partner in Houston, Brent Southwell, threatened to unseat “RINOs” in the legislature who stood in the way including Chairman Cook. “Our coalition will never again trust the fate of this initiative in the hand of current House leaders,” an angry Southwell wrote to Chairman Cook after the anti-union bill went down in flames in 2015.

Those anti-teachers’ union pro-school voucher activists now say they are willing to put their dollars where their mouths are as they look to remake the House GOP membership such that the caucus would unite behind a speaker who will pledge to fully support the Republican Party of Texas platform.

It will be a heavy lift.

More than 30 GOP incumbents have not signed the RPT’s speaker commitment form. And no matter what happens in the GOP caucus process, there is of course no mechanism for enforcing party discipline when members hit the floor to choose a presiding officer.

Pro-public education GOP candidates including Scott Milder, who’s taking on Patrick, and Sen. Joan Huffman’s challenger Fort Bend ISD Board President Kristin Tassin have very steep hills to climb. Their presence in those races, however, could moderate Senate leadership’s tone on education through the primary as Patrick skillfully walks the line between voicing support for teachers while mollifying voucher supporters.

Janesville School Board Asks State for Transparency on Vouchers

 December 14 –

Kevin Murray Janesville School Board President

Kevin Murray
Janesville School Board President

The Janesville School Board wants taxpayers to know how much of their money is going to voucher schools.

On Tuesday, the board passed a resolution asking state legislators to support Assembly Bill 267 and Senate Bill 183, which would require tax bills to include the amount of local tax dollars supporting voucher schools.

In the case of the Janesville School District, that amount is $187,180, the resolution said.

The bill is not expected to make it out of committee, said Bob Meyer, who works for state Rep. Dana Wachs, the Eau Claire Democrat who authored the bill.

But that doesn’t matter to school board President Kevin Murray.

Lawmakers won’t know the concerns of their constituents unless they voice them, Murray said.

“If you’re not involved in politics, you’re not involved in politics,” Murray said, meaning it’s important for school boards to raise the issue if others don’t.

School boards in Eau Claire, Holmen, Stevens Point, Wausau, South Milwaukee, Holmen, Baraboo and Merrill have passed similar resolutions.

Dan Rossmiller, government relations director for the Wisconsin Association of School Boards, explained why the issue has taken on greater importance.

Previously, money for voucher school students came from the state and was, in theory, separate from public school funding decisions. But starting in the 2015-16 school year, money for new voucher school students had to come from the students’ home districts. The Racine School District lost nearly $14 million because of the change, Rossmiller said.

Local school districts can raise taxes above state-imposed revenue caps to get that money back, but the caps limit the amount of money districts can raise through taxes.

“They’re robbing Peter to pay Paul,” Rossmiller said.

Most voters won’t be aware of how much of their school taxes supports the vouchers. They’ll just know their taxes have gone up, Rossmiller said.

Here’s the other catch: Because of the way the school funding system works, if school districts decide not to raise taxes to make up the loss, they could lose even more aid money the next year, Rossmiller said.

The Wisconsin Association of School Boards plans to bring a similar resolution to its annual meeting next month. The association supports the idea of noting voucher school money on tax bills. The group wants tax bills to show how much school taxes rose because of voucher schools.

The resolution passed by the Janesville School Board used additional information from the association to make its case, including:

— Payments to voucher schools will range from $7,757 to $8,403 per student in 2018-19. Even with all of Gov. Scott Walker’s proposed increases, some public schools will receive as much as $1,700 less per student, at $6,703.

— The 2017-18 voucher amount is $7,323 for students in kindergarten through eighth grade and $7,969 for students in grades nine to 12.

— Statewide, school districts had to raise taxes by $25 million in the 2016-17 school year to make up for voucher school tuition losses. The Wisconsin Legislative Fiscal Bureau expects that to increase to about $37 million in 2017-18 and $47 million in 2018-19.

It’s unclear if the school board resolutions will help advance the bill.

“There’s not one Republican co-sponsor on the bill,” Meyer said. “Given past history, we’re not overly confident it will be taken up.”

The Janesville resolution was sponsored by board member Jim Millard and co-sponsored by board members Ben Dobson and Carla Quirk.

Click here to read the full article….

John Kuhn Video

John Kuhn VideoCoalition for Public Schools invites you to view and share via social media and email this powerful video featuring Mineral Wells ISD Superintendent John Kuhn about the need for adequate funding for public schools.

See the video at

We are trying to get 1,000,000 views of this video, so please share with everyone you know!



Meet the Texas pastor who opposes public funding of religious education — and fights the Koch agenda

 November 17 – WASHINGTON POST

Rev. Charles Foster Johnson – Executive Director of Pastors for Texas Children

Rev. Charles Foster Johnson – Executive Director of Pastors for Texas Children

If you don’t know who Charles Foster Johnson is, here’s your chance to get acquainted. Johnson is the executive director of the nonprofit organization called Pastors for Texas Children, an independent ministry and outreach group that comprises nearly 2,000 pastors and church leaders from across Texas. Its mission, according to its website:

To provide “wrap-around” care and ministry to local schools, principals, teachers, staff and schoolchildren, and to advocate for children by supporting our free, public education system, to promote social justice for children, and to advance legislation that enriches Texas children, families, and communities.

Johnson and his organization come at their mission in a way that is very different from  that of other Christian faith leaders who support the use of public funds for private and religious education through voucher and similar programs. He doesn’t, and he has been a powerful voice in support of traditional public education in Texas. And that has made him a target for people who oppose his views, which Johnson addressed in a post this month on the organization’s website:

We believe public education is a provision of God’s common good. Our faith leads us to this conviction. All children, regardless of race, religion, or economics, deserves a quality education. It is the great democratic equalizer in American life. . . .

We are pastors and congregational leaders trying to make Texas a better place for everyone.

So, we must confess that we are taken aback by the acrimony and bitterness on the part of some public policy stakeholders toward our mission. We have been accused of being “in the pocket of the teacher unions” (we do not have unions in Texas), a “front organization for the Democratic Party” (most of our pastors are from rural communities well associated with the Republican Party), and “fake pastors” by a sitting member of the House of Representatives (overworked pastors know all too well how “real” our calling is.)

Now we are being labeled as “corrupt pastors” and a “fraud” by a group active in Texas policy debates.

We have not responded to these attacks. We are seasoned pastors not unaccustomed to criticism. Our Lord counseled his disciples, “Beware when all speak well of you.” Last we checked, our 8500 public schools, 5.4 million Texas schoolchildren, and 750,000 plus public school teachers and employees need us focused on them — not on a few naysayers.

But, we are compelled by the truth of God and the integrity of God’s mission for us now to confront what is a ludicrous lie. Can we not have a debate about school funding, vouchers, our social contract, and the public trust without this sophomoric name-calling?

We are simply congregational leaders trying to protect and preserve public education for all Texas children, as the Texas Constitution in Article 7, Section 1 clearly spells out: “It shall be the duty of the Legislature of this State to establish and make suitable provision for the support and maintenance of an efficient system of public free schools.” It is to this constitutional conservatism that we as faith leaders are committed.

Here is an interview with Johnson conducted by Jennifer Berkshire, the education editor at AlterNet and the co-host of a biweekly podcast on education in the time of President Trump. Berkshire worked for six years editing a newspaper for the American Federation of Teachers in Massachusetts. This piece first appeared on AlterNet and Berkshire gave The Washington Post permission to publish it.

Click here to read the full article….

After 24 Years, Vouchers Are Still Not the Answer for Texas Public Schools

Dr. Charles Luke Coalition for Public Schools Coordinator

Dr. Charles Luke
Coalition for Public Schools Coordinator

As the 85th session of the Texas legislature winds down, vouchers have once again been advanced by the Senate and repudiated by the House. We have to wonder: How many more times will we have this conversation? For the past 12 sessions (that’s 24 years!), those who want to privatize public schools have been pushing some form of voucher program. Lately, they have been using creative names like “tuition tax credit,” “insurance premium tax credit,” and “education savings account.” Earlier in the current legislative session, one of the members of the Senate Education Committee chided a concerned citizen for using the term “voucher” to describe Senate Bill 3, which proposes a combination of an insurance premium tax credit and an education savings account. “Why do you keep using the term “voucher”?” the senator wanted to know. “Because,” replied the testifier, “it takes public funds and sends them to private entities for educational purposes. That’s the definition of a voucher.”

As the House seems to understand and the Senate does not, a voucher by another name is still a voucher. Earlier this session, voucher supporter Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick challenged the House to “give an up or down vote” on vouchers. The House did just that, but not in the way that Patrick intended. They passed an amendment that disallows the expenditure of public funds for private education, sending a clear message to the Senate and Patrick regarding exactly how the House feels about vouchers.

The argument from those who support vouchers is always “Give us school choice!” But they already have school choice; the only difference is that now they want taxpayers to foot the bill. Increasingly, school choice is available within public schools. Many public schools now have creative career and technology programs that can compete on a worldwide basis along with district- and state-implemented mechanisms to allow students and parents a variety of options (in-district and inter-district transfers, public education grants, etc.). In schools where choice is more limited, the culprit is often poor state funding exacerbated by a depressed local economy. As the state’s share of public school funding continues to drop below 40 percent, these communities struggle to meet the daily social and educational demands of students, often finding themselves without the resources to create more robust public school choice programs.

Vouchers rob the public trust to advance private enterprise. If school choice advocates really want educational options, they should focus instead on providing adequate funding for communities whose schools suffer from a depressed economy. One way to do this is to simply keep the tax money that is collected for public schools in the public school system. As property values and taxes increase in local communities, the state increasingly shifts the burden for public education expenditures to local taxpayers. In fact, the Austin-based Center for Public Policy Priorities estimates that the state “repurposed” more than $1.8 billion in the 85th legislature in this manner.

Before the next legislative session, public education advocates should work hard to do two things. First, vote for senators (several are up for election in 2018) and representatives who support public schools. Second, work diligently to raise awareness for the idea that tax money raised for public schools should stay in public schools. Who knows, with the extra money, maybe we can even enhance school choice programs within our public schools.

The information in this article was current as of press time. Please check with for the most up-to-date information on voucher bills and the rest of ATPE’s legislative agenda.

Coalition for Public Schools and Friends Pen Letter to Texas Senators

House Bill 21 (HB 21), the school funding bill which had passed out of the House, went before the Senate Education Committee last week. At that hearing, the bill was substituted with Committee Substitute House Bill 21 (CSHB 21) which significantly altered the amount of dollars for school districts and added a Education Savings Account voucher for special needs (including 504) students on the bill.

On May 15th, several organizations met in Austin to discuss a unified response. As a result of the meeting on Monday, the Coalition for Public Schools was charged with drafting a letter to Senators. That letter was delivered by hand and electronically to all members of the Senate yesterday. CSHB 21 is on the Intent Calendar for May 18 and could come to the floor of the Senate on Friday, May 19.

Today, Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick indicated that he is ready to have multiple special sessions in order to get his bathroom bill and vouchers for special needs students.  This afternoon, Speaker of the House Joe Straus issued the following statement:

“I was encouraged by much of what Governor Patrick said today. I was especially glad to hear that Governor Patrick wants to start passing bills that are priorities of the House, such as mental health reforms, fixing the broken A-F rating system and cybersecurity. These are not poll-tested priorities, but they can make a very real difference in Texans’ lives. I am grateful that the Senate will work with us to address them.

“Budget negotiations are going well but are far from finished. The Senate has indicated a willingness to use part of the $12 billion Economic Stabilization Fund. In addition, the two sides, along with the Comptroller’s office, are working through concerns about the use of Proposition 7 funds to certify the budget.  I’m optimistic that we will produce a reasonable and equitable compromise on the budget. I appreciate the work of the Senate conferees and Governor Patrick on these issues.

“As I said in my letter to Governor Patrick, the House has worked diligently to pass priorities that are important to him. Senate Bill 2 has been scheduled for a vote on the floor of the House tomorrow. The House has already acted on a number of issues that are important to the Lieutenant Governor and will continue to do so. I’m glad that the Senate is beginning to extend the same courtesy.

“Governor Patrick talked about the importance of property tax relief. The Texas House is also concerned about property taxes, which is why we approved House Bill 21 to address the major cause of rising property-tax bills: local school taxes. As it passed the House, this legislation would begin to reduce our reliance on local property taxes in funding education. Nobody can claim to be serious about property-tax relief while consistently reducing the state’s share of education funding.  The House made a sincere effort to start fixing our school finance system, but the Senate is trying to derail that effort at the 11th hour. The Senate is demanding that we provide far fewer resources for schools than the House approved and that we begin to subsidize private education – a concept that the members of the House overwhelmingly rejected in early April. The House is also serious about providing extra and targeted assistance for students with disabilities. This is why we put extra money in House Bill 21 to help students with dyslexia. We also overwhelmingly passed House Bill 23 to provide grants for schools that work with students who have autism and other disabilities. The Lieutenant Governor has not referred that bill to a Senate committee.

“Governor Patrick’s threat to force a special session unless he gets everything his way is regrettable, and I hope that he reconsiders. The best way to end this session is to reach consensus on as many issues as we can. Nobody is going to get everything they want. But we can come together on many issues and end this session knowing that we have positively addressed priorities that matter to Texas.”

Never has it been clearer that we are in all-out pitched battle over the future of our public schools. The future of over 5.3 million school children are being jeopardized by the hubris of those who want to privatize our public schools and funnel taxpayer funds to private interests, all the while draining money away from our public schools – the very institution which helps promote social mobility, propagate our best interests, and preserve our democracy.

You can do two things: (1) Have as many people as you can call your Senator today to oppose the committee substitute to HB 21 and; (2) have those people also call your Representative and tell them to stand with Speaker Straus regarding his opposition to vouchers and his support for more funding for public schools.

Tell Texas Senators NO Vouchers!

83We need your help to stop a voucher bill that has been introduced in the Texas Senate.

SB 3 is a school voucher program in disguise. Charles Luke, a former Superintendent and the current Executive Director of the Coalition for Public Schools recently said, “A voucher by another name is still a thorn in the side of taxpayers whose tax dollars would be diverted from the public trust to private schools with little or no accountability.”

Under SB 3 all Texas children are eligible for an educational savings account (ESA) if they leave a public or charter school, or are entering school for the first time. Families with income double the reduced lunch amount will be eligible for $5,836 toward private or religious school tuition, or homeschooling expenses such as online courses, textbooks, curricula, tutors and purchase of computers.  Families under 2 times the reduced lunch threshold would collect $7,295 per child per year, and a disabled student $8,754 per child per year, regardless of disability or family income.

The bill would also implement a tax credit scholarship program, on top of ESAs.

SB3 could quickly “mushroom into a $3.2 billion a year transfer of state funds to private schools and vendors,” with Texas taxpayers on the hook.

A new organization with deep ties to Education Secretary Betsy DeVos has formed in Texas specifically to lobby for SB 3. Texans for Educational Opportunity (TEO) is led by Randan Steinhauser. Before moving to Austin, Texas in 2013, Steinhauser was based in Washington, D.C. and traveled the country pushing vouchers and school choice as the National Director of External Affairs for DeVos’s American Federation of Children.

Texans have been fighting back against the push for vouchers for decades. Tell your state senator that he/she needs to push back against the privatization agenda coming from DeVos and Washington, D.C..

Click here to send your letter!

Are education savings accounts the new private school vouchers?

Public school supporters want to keep state money out of the pockets of private schools, although the idea — popular among conservatives — is gaining traction months before the legislative session.

Elgin ISD Supt. Jodi Duron speaks at the Coalition for Public Schools Press Conference

Elgin ISD Supt. Jodi Duron speaks at the Coalition for Public Schools Press Conference

Advocates of the so-called school choice movement want the state to give each Texas student who no longer wants to attend public school an education savings account. The student would use the account to pay for other education options, such as private schools, tutors, curriculum for home schooling or college credit courses, giving students more choice in their education, according to proponents.

Public school supporters aren’t buying it. They say education savings accounts are masquerading as private school vouchers, diverting money from cash-strapped school districts to private schools without holding them to the same standard of accountability.

“You can put lipstick on a pig, but it’s still a pig. You can call a voucher something else, but it’s still a voucher,” said Charles Luke of the Coalition for Public Schools, which opposes using public funds to support private and religious schools. “We need to invest in our community schools rather than create a completely separate, parallel system and expand government.”

Read the entire article here…

About the Louisiana voucher system: Where failure really is an option

21by Mercedes Schneider

On May 19, 2016, Louisiana citizen James Finney submitted a public records request for data concerning student voucher applications submitted by the initial deadline of February 27, 2016, for the 2016-17 school year.

On July 21, 2016, the Louisiana Department of Education (LDOE) sent Finney this data file. (Note: This file is useful for deciphering school site codes.)

Louisiana’s voucher program has a poor reputation. In January 2016, the Brookings Institute published a piece entitled, “When Winners Are Losers: Private School Vouchers in Louisiana.” In February 2016, US News and World Report published an article entitled, “Evidence Mounts Against Louisiana Voucher Program.” In March 2016, Louisiana state superintendent John White was called out by state board members for promoting a report that said vouchers saved money in the face of testimony before the board that they actually cost more.

Read the entire article here…

SBOE Vice Chairman Thomas Ratliff releases information on education savings account voucher program

Thomas Ratliff, Vice Chairman of the Texas State Board of Education released the following information on July 24, 2016.  In the release, Ratliff clearly exposes the problems with the education savings account (ESA) voucher programs being proposed by several Texas organizations.


When I read about the proposed “education savings account” idea being proposed, I cannot help but think of one word – entitlement.  Is this an idea from President Obama?  Nope.  This is an idea from limited government conservative types.

Let’s be clear.  There are no “savings” in these accounts, because the recipient never would have paid enough taxes into the account in the first place.  There are only “donations” or “entitlements” in these accounts.  Let’s dig in to the details.

Texas spends around $8,500 per student per year in public schools.  In order for a family to pay enough taxes to fully pay that cost, the family would have to live in a $700,000 house or generate $125,000 in sales taxable transactions (or a combination of the two) PER YEAR, PER CHILD.  At these numbers, there are very, very few Texas families paying their own way.  So whose money are they saving?  Yours?  The elderly couple with no kids in school?  The local businesses in their hometown?  Yes, all of those are contributing to the “savings” account that this family can take wherever they want, apparently with no questions asked or accountability for the money.

So, how much is all of this going to cost?  The proponents of this plan want to make it available to families to spend on a variety of things, including private school tuition or homeschool curriculum.  There are currently 600,000 students who fall into those two categories alone.  Therefore, if the “savings account entitlement” is $6,000 per student, the total would be approximately $3.2 billion per year, or $6.4 billion per state budget.  Keep in mind, that NONE of these students get funding from the state budget today.

If that total figure isn’t shocking enough, let me explain how it will get even bigger.  What about the parents who, when they learn they can make an extra $500/mo. per month per kid, pull their kids out of public school and claim they will be home schooled – then simply keep the money without delivering the education.  It will happen. You can count on it. Those parents who are already disengaged from their child’s education would have no problem simply putting $500/mo. from each child’s education in their pocket.

This idea takes the word entitlement to a whole new level for Texas.  It is nothing more than a huge transfer of wealth with no way to control the price tag.

It should be very simple.  The Texas Constitution requires the state to provide a system of public free schools.  If a family chooses not to use it, they do not have the entitlement to take their neighbor’s money to the school of their choice.

On negative effects of vouchers

by Mark Dynarski


Mark Dynarski – Brookings Institution Center on Children and Families

Recent research on statewide voucher programs in Louisiana and Indiana has found that public school students that received vouchers to attend private schools subsequently scored lower on reading and math tests compared to similar students that remained in public schools. The magnitudes of the negative impacts were large. These studies used rigorous research designs that allow for strong causal conclusions. And they showed that the results were not explained by the particular tests that were used or the possibility that students receiving vouchers transferred out of above-average public schools.

To read the entire story click here ….

Special education-specific vouchers fail to include all students with disabilities

The Council of Parent Attorneys and Advocates, Inc. says in a new report that special education-specific voucher programs often fail to include all students with disabilities. The report also says that most states funding voucher programs don’t allow students with disabilities to retain their full rights under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act.

You can read the report by clicking here…..

Speaker Straus Instructs House to Consider Additional School Funding Reforms

Texas House Speaker Joe Straus called on two House committees Thursday to jointly study key aspects of the state’s school finance system and make recommendations before the next legislative session.

6Speaker Straus gave two new interim charges to the House Committee on Appropriations and the Committee on Public Education. The charges follow a recent Texas Supreme Court opinion that the state’s education finance system, while constitutional, is “undeniably imperfect, with immense room for improvement.” They also build on Speaker Straus’ earlier calls for the Public Education Committee to study the Cost of Education Index and school districts’ facility needs.

“We can improve educational quality while also making our school finance system more efficient,” said Speaker Straus, R-San Antonio. “Ignoring some of the problems in our current system will only make them worse. School finance reform never comes quickly or easily, which is why this work needs to continue sooner rather than later.”

Read the full story here…

Texas Supreme Court Upholds School Funding System

The Texas Supreme Court on Friday issued a ruling upholding the state’s public school funding system as constitutional, while also urging state lawmakers to implement “transformational, top-to-bottom reforms that amount to more than Band-Aid on top of Band-Aid.”

But without a court order directing the Legislature to fix specific provisions in the system, school groups worry that lawmakers will either do nothing or something outside the box.

“Our Byzantine school funding ‘system’ is undeniably imperfect, with immense room for improvement. But it satisfies minimum constitutional requirements,” Justice Don Willett wrote in the court’s 100-page opinion, which asserts that the court’s “lenient standard of review in this policy-laden area counsels modesty.”

For the full story click here….

Texas primary election results

Super Tuesday election-resultswas March 1, 2016 and with over three million people voting statewide, it was one of the biggest turnouts ever. The Coalition for Public Schools watched the elections closely.  Austin based HillCo Partners provided the following report:

Railroad Commission Runoffs
Republican – Gary Gates (28.4%) and Wayne Christian (19.8%).
Democrat – Grady Yarbrough (40%) and Cody Garrett (35.1%).

State Board of Education Runoffs
SBOE District 6 Democrat Runoff – Jasmine L. Jenkins (44%) and R. Dakota Carter (33%) will face each other in a runoff and the winner from that runoff will go on to face incumbent Donna Bahorich (R) during the November General Election.* [with 85.8% of precincts reporting]

SBOE District 9 Republican Runoff (open seat) – Mary Lou Bruner (48.5%) and Keven M. Ellis (31.1%) will face each other in a runoff. The winner will face Amanda Rudolph (D) in the November General Election for the open seat.

Legislative Incumbents Defeated or in Runoffs

4 legislative incumbents were defeated:
HD 4 – Lance Gooden captured 51.78% of the votes over incumbent Stuart Spitzer (48.21%)
HD 20 – Terry Wilson captured 54.25% of the votes over incumbent Marsha Farney (45.74%)
HD 55 – Hugh D. Shine received 50.30% of the votes over incumbent Molly White (49.69%)
HD 150 – Valoree Swanson garnered 52.46% of the votes over incumbent Debbie Riddle (39.64%)

3 legislative incumbents will go to runoffs:
HD 73 – Incumbent Doug Miller (43.47%) and Kyle Biedermann (39.84%)
HD 128 – Incumbent Wayne Smith (43.57%) and Briscoe Cain (48.01%)

HD 27 – Incumbent Ron Reynolds (48.46%) and Angelique Bartholomew (24.11%)

HD 120 – Barbara Gervin-Hawkins (26.20%) and Mario Salas (23.21%)
HD 139 – Kimberly Willis (31.92%) and Jarvis D. Johnson (28.72%)

SD 1 –  Bryan Hughes (47.98%) and David Simpson (21.26%)
SD 24 – Susan King (27.22%) and Dawn Buckingham (24.76%)
HD 5 – Cole Hefner (45.95%) and Jay Misenheimer (27.10%)
HD 18 – Keith Strahan (28.24%) and Ernest Bailes (25.92%)
HD 33 – John Keating (37.63%) and Justin Holland (32.90%)
HD 54 – Scott Cosper (41.71%) and Austin Ruiz (36.87%)
HD 64 – Lynn Stucky (42.25%) and Read King (30%)

May 24 will be will be the Primary Runoff Election with early voting for the runoffs occurring May 16-20.

For a full list of results go to:

The Coalition for Public Schools urges you to go vote!

Dear Friends,

As I’m sure you all know, election season is upon us.  Early voting in Texas is taking place through Friday, February 26th and Election Day will be this coming Tuesday, March 1st .

 Badge - 2008 electionThe Coalition for Public Schools would like to remind you to go vote for candidates that will support our neighborhood, public schools and the 5.2 million children that attend them.

With most of the races being determined in the primary elections in Texas, your vote is critical to ensuring that our public school children have what they need to be successful.

And please urge all educators to vote!  We cannot imagine a better example for schoolchildren then to see their teacher proudly wear that sticker, “I’ve voted!” More information can be found at

Again, we urge you to go vote this coming Tuesday, March 1st.  You can find out where to vote at: .

Nevada Supreme Court will review voucher program

by Diane Ravitch

The Education Law Center reports that the Nevada Supreme Court will review a lower court decision that enjoined the state’s new voucher program. Nevada’s legislators enacted the most sweeping voucher program in the nation, despite the fact that the state constitution says unequivocally that public money appropriated by the legislature is to be used only for public schools. Now, we will learn whether conservatives are serious when they claim to believe in a “strict” interpretation of the federal and state constitutions. Even as conservatives celebrate the late Justice Antonin Scalia for his “originalist” interpretation of the Constitution and laws, conservatives in states like Nevada are twisting and ignoring their state constitution to destroy public education. The same thing happened in Indiana, where the state constitution was written to prevent public funding of religious schools. The court, dominated by conservatives, found a way around the clear words of the state constitution to allow the new voucher program to proceed. At the very least, they could call a referendum to change the state constitution, but they didn’t and they won’t. That might lead to a loss, as it has for every voucher referendum. Original language be damned.

Read the rest of the story by clicking here.

Dr. Charles Luke speaks at Texas Public Policy Foundation conference

Dr. Charles Luke, the Coordinator for the Coalition for Public Schools spoke at the Texas Public Policy Foundation conference in January.  Listen to his speech about the value of our public schools and why vouchers don’t work.

When winners are losers: Private school vouchers in Louisiana

This month’s Powerball winners collected $1.6 billion, but not all lotteries turn out well for winners. In Louisiana, students who won a lottery for tuition scholarships to private schools wound up with worse academic performance than their peers who were lucky enough to lose the lottery.[i]

The affected students had won a voucher to attend, at no cost, a private school in Louisiana. Nineteen states have such voucher programs, with Louisiana’s the fifth-largest in the country. The vouchers, averaging $5,311 per student, must be accepted as full tuition at the private schools that participate in the program; schools are not allowed to ask students to “top-up” their vouchers if the school has a higher sticker price. Further, schools can’t pick and choose among the voucher winners. Instead, they have to take any student who holds a voucher.[ii]

Click here to read the full story…

School Choice:  What the research says


This week is the National School Choice Week. But what does choice really mean? Where does choice exist? And most importantly, what does it do for student achievement?

As one of the most touted education reform strategies, let’s take an unbiased look at what choices are and what research says about their effectiveness. After all, what parents and communities want mostly are good schools. And “choice” is no guarantee for good schools. As the Center for Public Education pointed out in its report, school choices work for some students sometimes, are worse for some students sometimes, and are usually no better or worse than traditional public schools.

You might also be surprised to find out that parents overwhelmingly choose to send their children to the neighborhood public school, and that more students are enrolled in a choice school within the public school system than outside of it.

Some reality checks on choice

  • A relatively small percentage of school-aged children are enrolled in schools of choice: 16 percent in public schools of choice, 13 percent in non-public schools of choice.
  • Nearly 90 percent of children attend public schools, a percentage that has remained constant for 40 years.
  • Public schools offer choice programs including magnet and charter schools, inter- and intra-district transfer, etc.
  • The national on-time high school graduation rate in public schools is at all-time high.
  • About three-fourths of charter schools performed about the same as or worse than traditional public schools.
  • Private school vouchers and tuition tax credits (funded by tax dollars) have no conclusive evidence of effectiveness.

Check out the entire report School Choice: What the Research Says .

Abbott names next education commissioner


Texas Education Commissioner Mike Morath

From The Texas Tribune – Gov. Greg Abbott on Monday appointed Dallas Independent School District Trustee Mike Morath as the state’s next education commissioner, describing him as “a proven education reformer.”

Morath, chairman of Morath Investments, has served on the Dallas school board since 2011. A vocal school-choice proponent, he pushed for a controversial — and, for now, scrapped — “home rule” policy that would have allowed the Dallas school district to escape state control.

He will succeed Michael Williams as head of the Texas Education Agency, which oversees the state’s more than 1,200 school districts, including charters. Williams, appointed by then-Gov.Rick Perry in 2012, is stepping down Jan. 1.

It is the second leadership post to which Abbott has appointed Morath in recent weeks, although the latest will trump the first. Last month, Abbott picked the apparently avid mountain climber to head a new legislative commission that will recommend changes to the state’s method of student assessment and school accountability. Abbott will have to appoint someone else to head the 15-member Commission on Next Generation Assessments and Accountability, which  must make recommendations by Sept. 1.

Michael Williams stepping down as Texas Education Agency chief

Michael Williams says after years of working Austin — guiding the Texas Education Agency and serving on the Texas Railroad Commission — it’s time to come home.

“During the course of my career in public service, I have held two statewide positions since 1999,” Williams said in a resignation letter submitted Thursday to Gov. Greg Abbott. “Both of those are based in Austin.

“While carrying out my responsibilities, I have kept my house in Arlington and managed to maintain a long-distance partnership with my wife,” he wrote. “But after more than 16 years of weekend commuting, I feel it is finally time to simply head home.”

Williams said he will step down from his post as Commissioner of Education on Jan. 1.

Abbott thanked Williams for his service.

“Commissioner Williams is a public servant dedicated to elevating our state’s education system to be the best in the nation,” Abbott said. “I am grateful for his leadership and steadfast advocacy on behalf of our students, and I wish him the best of luck in all future endeavors.”

The Wrong School Choice – Nevada’s New School Voucher Law Will Make Inequality Worse

By David Osborne – July 6, 2015 – US News and World Report

I’m struggling to understand an intellectual disconnect of the first order.


The real choice provided by school vouchers!

Nearly everyone involved in education reform wrings their hands about the achievement gaps between poor and nonpoor, between white and minority students. And most Americans are increasingly disturbed about widening inequality of income and wealth.

Yet when Nevada enacted the nation’s first law last month creating almost universal access to vouchers (technically, education savings accounts, or ESAs), few reformers pointed out that it would undermine equal opportunity. Dozens of bloggers weighed in; the Fordham Institute even invited 14 of them to comment. And not one of the 14 mentioned that the new bill would make access to quality education less equal than it is today.

Read entire article here.

Brief Summary – Texas 84th Legislature

The 84th Legislative Session gaveled out on June 1 adjourning Sine Die. During the 84th Session there were a total of 6,276 House and Senate bills filed and a total of 1,323 bills were passed (not including resolutions). To further break down the statistics there were 819 House bills passed (a 12% increase from the last regular session) and 504 Senate bills passed (a 29% decrease from last session).

The final deadline of the 84th Session was the last day the Governor can sign or veto bills passed during the regular session – June 21. Governor Abbott ended up vetoing 42 bills from the 84th Regular Session not including line item vetoes.

Below is a review of the bills vetoed by the Governor. Additionally, click on the following links for the list of bills signed, vetoed or filed with a signature (including HCRs and SCRs):

Voucher Bills:

No voucher bills or voucher-type bills passed this legislative session.  SB 4 – a tax credit voucher bill – did pass the Senate but died in the House.

School Funding:

Education – For the 2016-17 biennium, public education saw enrollment growth funded and additional $1.5B in the Foundation School Program (FSP) over current law which includes: $200M from HB 7 addressing fractional funding; $55.5M for the Instructional Facilities Allotment to provide tax relief for property-poor districts issuing bonds for local facility needs; and $47.5M for the New Instructional Facilities Allotment to provide start-up funds for new district and charter school campuses.

Tax Relief – An increase in homestead exemptions ($1.2B) and franchise tax relief ($2.6B) will result in $3.8B tax relief. Those two bills combined with other tax relief bill passed during session, resulted in the final total for the 84th Session of providing over $4B in tax relief.

School Voucher Bills Under Scrutiny

The Senate Public Education Committee is considering three bills that would allow for state-funded school vouchers.  It’s something that’s drawn the ire of the the Coalition for Public Schools.   The group sent the following letter to the Committee Chairman Senator Larry Taylor:  See the entire article here …

Texas Lawmakers Wrangle a Herd of Education Bills

Charles A. Luke, the coordinator for the Austin-based Coalition for Public Schools, which supports higher spending on K-12 and opposes private school choice programs, said the $130 million plan from GOP Rep. Dan Huberty to expand kindergarten (an idea backed by Gov. Abbott) making its way through the state House of Representatives is a good step forward. But the coalition, which includes associations representing the state’s local school boards and administrators, believes more resources need to be provided to the overall K-12 system, instead of chipping away at traditional public schools through what Mr. Luke called “privatization” attempts. Read the entire Education Week article here…

Online Schools Would Get Big Bucks via “Virtual Vouchers”

On Thursday, the Senate Education Committee heard SB 894 ,chaired by Chairman Taylor, which would remove limits on expansion of full-time, online schools in Texas. SB 894 would provide what amounts to “virtual vouchers” for students who have been enrolled in private schools or have been home-schooled, and who have been enrolled in a public school. This specific bill would also push for full-time online schooling all the way down to kindergarten; current law funds such online programs only for students in the third grade and above. Read the entire article here …

Four Things In Texas Education To Watch This Legislative Session 

National Public Radio’s Laura Isensee interviewed Dr. Charles Luke of the Coalition for Public Schools regarding the 84th Texas legislative session.  Click here to read the article and to hear the interview via Soundcloud.

Coalition for Public Schools Blasts First Voucher Bill of the 2015 Session

Sen. Donna Campbell, a San Antonio Republican, has pre-filed the first private-school voucher bill of the 2015 session, SB 276. Sen. Campbell timed the pre-filing of her bill to coincide with issuance of a pro-voucher report by a pro-voucher advocacy group in Austin. Her bill was greeted with a hard-hitting critique by the Coalition for Public Schools, in which Texas AFT and more than 30 other community, education, and labor organizations united in support of neighborhood public schools. Here is the Coalition for Public Schools press release in full:  See the full article by Texas AFT here.

Texas education head refuses to let up on vouchers by Dr. Charles Luke

For more than 20 years and a dozen legislative sessions, the Texas Legislature has defeated one proposal after another that would have diverted scarce taxpayer dollars from public schools and transferred the money to unaccountable private schools. Just last year, there was a test of legislative sentiment on the issue in the Texas House, and by a bipartisan supermajority of 103 to 43, our state representatives voted to ban any spending for private-school vouchers.  Read the entire article in the Houston Chronicle here.

December 2, 2014 – Pre-Legislative Symposium

The Coalition for Public Schools (CPS) represents over 30 education, religious, and child advocacy organizations, including the Association of Texas Professional Educators (ATPE) which created these videos. Founded in 1995, CPS advocates for the support of public neighborhood schools while opposing privatization through vouchers and other means.

CPS held a pre-session legislative symposium on Dec. 2, 2014, at the Texas Capitol. The event featured panels of national education researchers and key state advocates discussing the topic of privatization. The event was open to members of the media, legislators and their staffs, education advocates, and the public. Video of the entire event can be viewed in sections using the links below:

  • First panel: Dr. Kevin Welner, Director of the National Education Policy Center; Dr. Julie Fisher Mead, Department of Educational Leadership and Policy Analysis, University of Wisconsin – Madison; and Dr. Luis Huerta, Teachers College, Columbia University
  • Second panel: Dr. David Anthony, Raise Your Hand Texas; Leslie Boggs, President, Texas PTA; and Gina Hinojosa, School Board Trustee, Austin ISD
  • Allen Weeks, Save Texas Schools
  • John Kuhn, Superintendent, Perrin-Whitt ISD
  • Steven Aleman, Disability Rights Texas
  • Dr. Charles Luke, CPS Coordinator, speaking on behalf of Rev. Charles Foster Johnson, Pastors for Texas Children

October 30, 2014 – Letter to U.S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan

The Coalition for Public Schools wrote a letter to US Secretary of Education Arne Duncan regarding the Texas Pre-K Expansion Grant application and the inclusion of a voucher in the application.  Read the full letter here.