Regular Session of the 86th Texas Legislature
No Tax Credit vouchers were introduced in the regular session of the 86th Texas Legislature.
Special Session of the 85th Texas Legislature
HB 58 by Simmons would provide a credit against an entity’s state premium insurance tax liability. This credit goes to fund non-public school tuition managed by an educational assistance organization and thereby diverts tax monies away from public schools to private schools.
HB 58 Talking Points may be found here.
HB 253 by Simmons would provide a $150 million in additional state aid for tax reduction to qualifying districts under a hardship grant and raise the Existing Debt Allotment for public schools. The bill contains a State Premium Tax Credit for donors and and Educational Expense Assistance voucher that is companion to SB 2. Talking points for HB 253 are identical to those for SB 2.
SB 2 by L. Taylor would provide a few funding concessions to public schools but contains a State Premium Tax Credit for donors and an Educational Expense Assistance voucher for students with a disability. The amount of the voucher may not exceed $10,000 or the full amount of tuition to a private school, whichever is less. The bill would require school districts to notify the parents of eligible students about the availability of the vouchers and inform them that they may be giving up their due process rights under the law by accessing them.
SB 2 Talking Points (CFPS) may be found here.
Regular Session of the 85th Texas Legislature
SB 542 by Bettencourt and its companion HB 1184 by Bohac have been filed in the Texas Legislature.
The bills are similar to the tax credit scholarship bills filed last session but do not apply to the franchise tax. They apply to the insurance premium tax.
You can read the bills at:
Downloadable HB 1184 Tax Credit Voucher Talking Points
“Tax credit” or “taxpayer savings” type vouchers that are introduced into the 85th Texas Legislature will be listed here. The Coalition for Public Schools would like to point out the following issues with most of these vouchers:
- Texas cannot afford to fund two school systems, one public and private system, when schools are already shortchanged. Despite the partial restoration of the 2011 budget cuts, Texas remains in the bottom quarter of states in per pupil funding and lags far below 2008 pre-recession per-pupil funding levels when adjusted for inflation. When a public school student child uses a tax credit voucher, the public school loses the revenue, but not the cost for teachers, utilities, facilities, etc. Over time, the cost of vouchers could siphon off even more education dollars should unlimited home school virtual schools get into the act. We simply can’t afford to pay for a private education system when we don’t properly fund the one we have.
- No accountability for voucher tax dollars – Under these voucher bills, private schools would not be required to meet state curriculum requirements or maintain the same fiscal accountability as public schools. Texans overwhelmingly believe that schools that receive tax dollars should be accountable for how they are spent, but the schools that receive tax credit vouchers would not be accountable to taxpayers.
- Subsidizes the wealthy at the expense of others that can’t afford it – Tax credit, savings account and reimbursement voucher schemes are inherently designed to be used by those who generate enough income to “need” a tax break. Economically disadvantaged parents would not be able to use a voucher unless they could afford pay the difference between the voucher check and the actual tuition, in addition to the cost of transportation. Other taxpayers would pay the price for vouchers that would primarily benefit those who could afford expensive private schools.
- “Savings” are a cut to education funding – Any “savings” are to the state and are almost entirely at the expense of the local school district that a transferring student leaves. If one or two children leave a classroom, the district’s costs are barely reduced, if at all, and certainly not in proportion to the district’s loss of funds. That lost funding would still be needed to maintain the program, causing local taxpayers to have to pick up the cost, or the local district to reduce needed programs.
- Students with disabilities give up their rights – Under these bills, “students with a disability attending an eligible nonpublic school may not receive the services a student with a disability attending a public school is entitled to receive under federal and state law”. This results in a loss of federal and state protections for these students that have been put in place to ensure that they receive a quality education.
For more information contact Dr. Charles Luke at email@example.com or by phone at 940-768-8594.